Last edited by Torr
Saturday, July 25, 2020 | History

4 edition of India-Pakistan nuclear proliferation found in the catalog.

India-Pakistan nuclear proliferation

Hearing before the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific of the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, ... Congress, second session, June 18, 1998

by United States

  • 136 Want to read
  • 13 Currently reading

Published by For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office .
Written in English


The Physical Object
Number of Pages78
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL7377708M
ISBN 100160576571
ISBN 109780160576577

Nuclear Weapons Programs, Policies, and Practices. The Nuclear Arsenal, an Overview. Pakistan developed nuclear weapons outside of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Pakistan’s nuclear program dates back to the s and was spurred on by India’s first nuclear test in Pakistan is estimated to have a nuclear arsenal of warheads. Dean Rust was Director of the State Department Nuclear Proliferation Bureau from Thomas W. Simons, Jr. served as Ambassador to Pakistan from They were all interviewed by Charles Stuart Kennedy beginning in April , December , and July respectively.

having nuclear weapons approaches zero (Waltz 50—51; —55). If one believes this, then the spread and proliferation of nuclear weapons should have positive consequences. This will be analyzed later in the India—Pakistan context. Virtually every structural deterrence theorist believes that the high cost of war in.   Part 1: Power Shifts and Nuclear Weapons 1. Power Shifts and Nuclear Weapons Part 2: The Legacies of Nuclear History and the Requirements of a New Consensus on Non-proliferation and Disarmament First Nuclear Era 3. Post Cold War doctrines 4. A global consensus on non-proliferation and disarmament Part 3: Proliferation Problems and the Role of Nuclear Disarmament 5.

Discussing the requirements of a new international consensus on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, this book builds on the three pillars of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT): non-proliferation, disarmament and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. to deal with the states that never joined the NPT (India, Pakistan and Israel.   There are those who believe that nuclear proliferation on the part of India and Pakistan has deterred not only nuclear, but conventional war between the two hostile states. Sumit Ganguly and S. Paul Kapur debate this in a new book, India, Pakistan, and the Bomb (Columbia University Press, ). Ganguly falls under the heading of "nuclear.


Share this book
You might also like
Human systems research

Human systems research

Nano- and biocomposites

Nano- and biocomposites

Age and authority in early modern England.

Age and authority in early modern England.

Strategy for the West.

Strategy for the West.

Aspects of history

Aspects of history

The Nile

The Nile

pattern of communist revolution

pattern of communist revolution

K-12 education in Washington

K-12 education in Washington

A Time for Prayer

A Time for Prayer

Prize list and general regulations of the third annual agricultural, industrial, and mechanical exhibition of the Dominion of Canada

Prize list and general regulations of the third annual agricultural, industrial, and mechanical exhibition of the Dominion of Canada

Pitmen born & bred

Pitmen born & bred

Historical scrapbook of early advertising art

Historical scrapbook of early advertising art

An internal audit model for the U.S. Coast Guard

An internal audit model for the U.S. Coast Guard

Blood orbits

Blood orbits

India-Pakistan nuclear proliferation by United States Download PDF EPUB FB2

Nuclear weapons have a similarly double-edged effect in the India-Pakistan relationship today. India and Pakistan fought three conventional wars—in, and —before acquiring Author: Caitlin Talmadge. In MayIndia and Pakistan put to rest years of speculation as to whether they possessed nuclear technology and openly tested their weapons.

Some believed nuclearization would stabilize South Asia; others prophesized disaster. Authors of two of the most comprehensive books on South Asia's new nuclear era, Sumit Ganguly and S. Paul Kapur, offer competing theories on the transformation of.

India and Pakistan exemplify the paradox of nuclear proliferation: both nations can be assured of obliterating the other in the event of nuclear confrontation, so conventional attacks as Author: Meaghan Tobin.

Book Reviews. Capsule Reviews Why the India-Pakistan Crisis Isn’t Likely to Turn Nuclear Other nuclear states have also clashed without resorting to nuclear weapons. InChina, then an incipient nuclear weapons state, and the Soviet Union, a full-fledged nuclear power, came to blows over islands in the Ussuri River, which runs Author: Sumit Ganguly.

In MayIndia and Pakistan put to rest years of speculation as to whether they possessed nuclear technology and openly tested their weapons. Some believed nuclearization would stabilize South Asia; others prophesized disaster. Authors of two of the most comprehensive India-Pakistan nuclear proliferation book on South Asia's new nuclear era, 'umit Ganguly and S.

Paul Kapur, offer competing theories on the transformation of. Briefing Book Documents. The documents in the briefing book date from to InIndia had an advanced civilian nuclear program, while Pakistan's was in its early stages.

This title was first published in Using extensive case studies of the nuclear weapons programmes of India, Pakistan, Israel, Iraq, Iran, Egypt and Syria, this important work shows that a higher than normal probability of war in protracted conflict regions, prompts states to search for credible deterrents such as nuclear weapons.

The book rigorously examines the factors that affect the. Pakistan is one of nine states to possess nuclear an began development of nuclear weapons in January under Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who delegated the program to the Chairman of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) Munir Ahmad Khan with a commitment to having the bomb ready by the end of Since PAEC, consisting of over twenty laboratories and.

Following the delivery of the first batch of fighter Rafale jets on Wednesday, a rattled Pakistan has now accused India of ‘nuclear proliferation’ and leading an arms race in the region. Speaking to the media, Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson Aisha Farooqui said that the country has taken note on India’s recent military acquisition.

The book ‘Nuclear Weapons and Conflict Transformation: The Case of India-Pakistan’ by Saira Khan explores how introduction of nuclear weapons in South Asia has transformed the protracted conflict into an insolvable puzzle.

The book is divided into two parts and ten chapters. The first. This is a great book for learning about the India-Pakistan conflict as well as nuclear deterrence theory. Šumit Ganguly and S. Paul Kapur, both first-class strategists, examine the effects of nuclear weapons on the rivalry between Islamabad and New Delhi and reach carefully reasoned yet opposing conclusions.

The utility of nuclear arms in the post-Cold War period logically becomes negligible. Finally, nuclear proliferation in South Asia harms Pakistan more than it hurts India.

Pakistan's nuclear pursuit is primarily meant to meet its security needs, the peaceful acquisition of nuclear. Using a constructivist model, this study brings nuclear arms control and disarmament back into the debates on the future of Indo-Pakistani relations.

Constructivism recognizes the independent impact of international norms, such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Norm (NNPN), on India and Pakistan’s nuclear s: 1.

India-Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation [U.S. Congress] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. India-Pakistan Nuclear ProliferationAuthor: U.S. Congress. Pakistan got away with its nuclear proliferation in because of perceived need by the Bush administration of Islamabad's help and the transit facility Pakistan offered in.

The history of Indo-Pakistani conflict -- Competing arguments about South Asian proliferation -- South Asia's nuclear past -- South Asia's nuclear present and future -- Three points of agreement "In MayIndia and Pakistan put to rest years of speculation about whether they possessed nuclear technology and openly tested their weapons.

Using a constructivist model, this study brings nuclear arms control and disarmament back into the debates on the future of Indo-Pakistani relations. Constructivism recognizes the independent impact of international norms, such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Norm (NNPN), on India and Pakistan’s nuclear behavior.

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Secretly Renewed Work on a Nuclear Explosive SIX Political Tumult and Inattention to the Nuclear Program SEVEN India Explodes a "Peaceful" Nuclear Device EIGHT The Nuclear Program Stalls NINE More Robust Nuclear Policy Is Considered TEN.

Section three looks at the three de facto nuclear states: India, Pakistan and Israel. The fourth section examines the three problem areas in the proliferation matrix today – Iran, North Korea and the potent mix of non-state actors and nuclear weapons.

"The fact that Pakistan, India and Israel – according to some estimates – possess nuclear weapons does not indeed help strengthen the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT]," Vladimir Yermakov, head of the Russian foreign ministry's arms control and non-proliferation department, told media on Wednesday.

At any rate, pushing India and Pakistan – two nuclear-armed neighbors and foes. @article{osti_, title = {Nuclear nonproliferation: India Pakistan. Research report}, author = {Fallon, J S}, abstractNote = {As most of the world continues to seek ways to reduce or eliminate the spread of nuclear weapons, two countries seem intent on pursuing a path which is contradictory.

India and Pakistan, two neighboring and frequently warring nations, condemn the use of nuclear. The book gives quite a sobering illustration of how lesser states like Israel, India, Pakistan, and the numerous arab states have sought, completed, and are still seeking nucleur weapons of mass destruction.

Most of the book is a detailed chronology of nuclear proliferation from the days of the Manhattan project up until the end of the Reviews: India's test of a nuclear device in was more of a physics experiment than a workable bomb design, and India's nuclear enclave was chafing at the bit.

If ever there was a juncture to break free of New Delhi's decades-long ambivalence regarding nuclear weapons, it was, paradoxically, at a time of progress to prevent proliferation and to end.